What do we like to watch on television? Chaos. The most damage the better, as some hockey fans would say. No sport would hire enforcers to do the dirty work and take out other players if there wasn't money behind it, driving the action. Of course, this money can only come from fans and who enjoy seeing other people get hurt - and punished, as some would see it. That being said, the sport can be enjoyed by people uninterested in the violence, but if hitting were to be taken away would there still be the same fan base? This isn't about hockey, though. Think about all the reality television shows that we subject ourselves to, and what the people on them do. All we ever see of their interactions are the arguments, the bitter fights between contestants and characters. There is always someone pitted against another, or else it wouldn't be as entertaining to watch. The same applies to fictional television series. In drama, the characters have to be angry with one another, and even in comedy, some of the funniest scenes are just simply, people raging.
Funnily enough, aren't we always told, "Don't worry, be happy"? Everyone is always rhyming off some quote from a well known author essentially saying the same thing; you have to be happy, or else life isn't complete. Then we turn on our televisions to watch that one movie with the great fight scene. How are humans expected to be happy when the pressure for drama is so strong? Some people cannot exist without an ongoing fight, whether in their lives or through others'. This goes beyond catharsis and the relieving of emotions - it's as though we feel our emotions, for lack of better terminology, need to turn into a mountain from a molehill. In connection with blogging, the funniest and most direct posts have a firm background in fury.
You never see anyone totally pleased when what they're reading praises something. There is always something wrong with someone else, something else, and that is that. It's engrained into our minds that chaos, redemption, revenge and outbursts of rage are the best way to use our energy, when we could be productive through our other emotions. The reality is, the product is never as pure as when we aren't angry. Art is fresher, more raw, music is more relatable, and our speech is much more passionate. It's not very often a speaker goes onstage to inform other of a happy-go-lucky situation is it? There is a tendency for these speeches to be about something that needs to change, and that's likely infuriating the advocate. Take Invisible Children, for example, an organization that is currently working on a campaign. They aren't saying, "the world is a good place, be happy," they're saying, "the state of the world is in disrepair and it makes us mad, so we have to help!"
Fortunately, they are attempting to help, an example of beneficial anger. Anger can be used productively if we can harness it correctly, it's not as though our very nature is going to change. People can't help this emotion overruling all the others, and since there's nothing that can be done about it, rage on, humans, rage on.
Alanis Morissette produced an amazing song, "You Oughta Know," and it's fairly obvious that she was furious when she wrote it.


